Cases
CALLAGHAN et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01199
Plaintiff: JANET CALLAGHAN and JOHN CALLAGHAN
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , SEPTA and AMTRAK
Cross_claimant: AMTRAK
Cross_defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Curtis &Associates, P.C. v. The Law Offices of David M. Bu
as 11-149
Plaintiff - Appellant: W. Robert Curtis, Sc.D., J.D. and Curtis & Associates, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee: The Law Offices of David M. Bushman, Esq., David M. Bushman, Attorney at Law, Janet Callaghan and others
Curtis & Associates, P.C. et al v. The Law Offices of David M. Bushman, Esq. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00890
Plaintiff: Curtis & Associates, P.C. and W. Robert Curtis, Sc.D., J.D.
Defendant: The Law Offices of David M. Bushman, Esq., David M. Bushman, David M. Bushman, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?