Lajszky v. Astrue

Lajszky v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Rosemary S. Lajszky
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2009cv01844
Filed:	May 4, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Carol B. Amon
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 11, 2017	Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Brigandi is accordingly ordered to provide supplemental briefing to this Court by May 25, 2017, explaining why, under these facts, this Court should award him a percentage of Lajszky's past-due benefits as attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Brigandi is instructed to specifically address whether-and if so, how-Lajszky's ultimate receipt of benefits can be construed as having been awarded "by reason of" a "favorable judgment&qu ot; rendered by this Court in a case in which Brigandi was representing Lajszky. The government is also instructed to supplement its letter explaining its position in light of the above. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/11/2017. (Fernandez, Erica)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 11, 2017

Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Brigandi is accordingly ordered to provide supplemental briefing to this Court by May 25, 2017, explaining why, under these facts, this Court should award him a percentage of Lajszky's past-due benefits as attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Brigandi is instructed to specifically address whether-and if so, how-Lajszky's ultimate receipt of benefits can be construed as having been awarded "by reason of" a "favorable judgment&qu ot; rendered by this Court in a case in which Brigandi was representing Lajszky. The government is also instructed to supplement its letter explaining its position in light of the above. Ordered by Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/11/2017. (Fernandez, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lajszky v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosemary S. Lajszky
Represented By:	Douglas C.J. Brigandi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?