Milien v. Astrue

Milien v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Nalia Milien
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2010cv02447
Filed:	May 28, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	John Gleeson
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 16, 2010	Filing 23 ORDER denying 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum and order, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, Milien's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, and the case is remanded to the Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 12/16/2010. (Glaser, Miriam)
June 7, 2010	Filing 3 ORDER: The administrative record shall be filed by 8/30/2010. The Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings shall be filed by 9/13/2010. Opposition to Motion (and any Cross-Motion) to be filed on or before 9/27 /2010. Motion(s) for Judgment on the Pleadings to be argued on 10/8/2010 at 11:30 a.m. The plaintiff is granted leave to proceed without being required to prepay fees or costs, or give security therefore. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge John Gleeson, on 6/7/2010) C/mailed. (Inter-Off. Svc. upon the USMS) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 16, 2010

Filing 23 ORDER denying 11 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum and order, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, Milien's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, and the case is remanded to the Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 12/16/2010. (Glaser, Miriam)

June 7, 2010

Filing 3 ORDER: The administrative record shall be filed by 8/30/2010. The Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings shall be filed by 9/13/2010. Opposition to Motion (and any Cross-Motion) to be filed on or before 9/27 /2010. Motion(s) for Judgment on the Pleadings to be argued on 10/8/2010 at 11:30 a.m. The plaintiff is granted leave to proceed without being required to prepay fees or costs, or give security therefore. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge John Gleeson, on 6/7/2010) C/mailed. (Inter-Off. Svc. upon the USMS) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Milien v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nalia Milien
Represented By:	Christopher James Bowes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?