Nance v. Padughbe et al
| Harold M Nance |
| T.A. Albert, T.A. Cassius, Dr. John Doe, Drs. John and Jane Doe, Peggy Healy, Ineffective Attorney Jane Doe and John Doe, Jane Doe 063 PCT, John Doe 063 PCT, NYC PO Padughbe, Pat and Dr. Sayha |
| Abraham Davis |
| 1:2011cv00583 |
| February 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for the limited purpose of this Order. The complaint as currently presented fails to state a claim against any defendant. In light of plaintiff& #039;s pro se status, the Court grants plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order. No summons shall issue at this time, and all further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days. If plaintiff fails to f ile an amended complaint, the action shall be dismissed without prejudice and judgment shall enter. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is therefore denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 3/1/2011) C/mailed by Chambers. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
