Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Walker v. Texter, et al.
as 1:2026cv00917
Plaintiff:
Scott Walker
Defendant:
Officer William Texter, Ken Branner, Jr., City of Middletown, DE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregor (PS) v. C.D.O.C. et al
as 1:2026cv03300
Plaintiff:
Daniel Pat Gregor
Defendant:
C.D.O.C., ACF, FCF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2026cv05021
Plaintiff:
SCOTT WALKER
Defendant:
TEA TAYLOR, PAT AND RON FOX, JOAN WINCHESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisa Miller v. George Taylor, et al
as 26-2483
Plaintiff:
LISA MILLER
Defendant:
GEORGE TAYLOR, LILLIAN LYNN TAYLOR, WAYNE GREESON and others
Muhammad v. Dowell et al
as 1:2026cv08226
Plaintiff:
James E Muhammad
Defendant:
Pat Dowell, City of Chicago and Unknown Third Ward Employess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
(HC) Kelly v. Horn et al
as 1:2026cv05302
Petitioner:
James Carl Kelly
Respondent:
Pat Horn, Shubhangini Devine and Gavin Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lisa Miller v. George Taylor, et al
as 26-2390
Plaintiff:
LISA MILLER
Defendant:
GEORGE TAYLOR, LILLIAN LYNN TAYLOR, WAYNE GREESON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mathewson v Mascaro et al
as 1:2026cv00202
Defendant:
Town of Thermopolis Police Officer Mascaro, Hot Springs County Sheriff's Deputy Friend, Hot Springs County Sheriff's Deputy Jahad and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Douglas Mathewson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
