Besignano v. Astrue

Besignano v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	James Besignano
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2012cv06123
Filed:	December 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 6, 2017	Filing 35 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Plaintiffs counsels unopposed motion for the award of attorney's fees is granted, and attorneys fees are awarded in the amount of $35,267.50 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiffs counsel is directed to remit to Plaintiff the $7,600.00 previously awarded as attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. This case was closed previously by court order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 4/6/2017. (Irizarry, Dora)
August 14, 2014	Filing 23 ORDER denying Defendant's 13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and REMANDING for further proceedings -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTA CHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Plaintiff's motion for remand is granted, for the limited purpose of obtai ning clarification from the state agency consulting physician regarding Plaintiff's work restrictions and whether that clarification alters the conclusion that Plaintiff is not disabled. Accordingly, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's decision is reversed, in part, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the ATTACHED OPINION AND ORDER. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 8/14/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 6, 2017

Filing 35 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Plaintiffs counsels unopposed motion for the award of attorney's fees is granted, and attorneys fees are awarded in the amount of $35,267.50 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Plaintiffs counsel is directed to remit to Plaintiff the $7,600.00 previously awarded as attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. This case was closed previously by court order. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 4/6/2017. (Irizarry, Dora)

August 14, 2014

Filing 23 ORDER denying Defendant's 13 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and REMANDING for further proceedings -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTA CHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied. Plaintiff's motion for remand is granted, for the limited purpose of obtai ning clarification from the state agency consulting physician regarding Plaintiff's work restrictions and whether that clarification alters the conclusion that Plaintiff is not disabled. Accordingly, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's decision is reversed, in part, and this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the ATTACHED OPINION AND ORDER. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 8/14/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Besignano v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Candace Scott Appleton
Represented By:	SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Besignano
Represented By:	Christopher James Bowes
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?