Solomon et al v. Kalish et al
| Robert Solomon and Jane Solomon |
| Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP, Melvin J. Kalish and The Law Offices of Melvin J. Kalish, PLLC |
| 1:2013cv05140 |
| September 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, plaintiffs' motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for the sole purpose of this Order. In addition, upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") issued on September 27, 2013 by the Hon. Steven M. Gold, Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge, and the objections thereto, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. The complaint is dismissed as t o all defendants. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. Un ited States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se plaintiffs and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/24/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
