Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Chanh Trinh et al v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2023cv04521
Plaintiff:
Chanh V. Trinh, Brian E. Sawyers, Dennis McPherson and others
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz, Bureau of Prisons, Law Office of Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv04089
Defendant:
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP, a California limited liability partnership, CENTENE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, HEALTH NET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Plaintiff:
DUAL DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT CENTER, INC., a California corporation, SHREYA HEALTH OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, SHREYA HEALTH OF ARIZONA, INC., an Arizona corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Anthony A. Patel v. Charles Robinson et al
as 2:2019cv02851
Defendant:
Charles Robinson, Kinsella Weitzman Iser Kump and Aldisert LLP, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Patel and Anthony A Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FamilyCare, Inc. v. Oregon Health Authority, et al.
as 2:2018mc00100
Defendant:
Lynne Saxton, Patrick Allen and Oregon Health Authority
Plaintiff:
FamilyCare, Inc.
In Re:
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP and Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP
Interested Party:
Manatt Phelps and Phillips LLP
Solomon et al v. Kalish et al
as 1:2013cv05140
Defendant:
Melvin J. Kalish, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP and The Law Offices of Melvin J. Kalish, PLLC
Plaintiff:
Jane Solomon and Robert Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephanie Chase v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2012cv09790
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Chase
Defendant:
Manatt Phelps and Phillips LLP and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
