Ramos v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ramos and Elizabeth Ramos
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2016cv05107
Filed: September 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Nina Gershon
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accomodations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2016 Filing 16 Notice from Kings County Supreme Court re #15 Order of Remand to State Court. (Certified copy of remand order resent as requested by Kings County Supreme Court.) (Barrett, C)
December 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order of Remand to Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, case number 513091/2016. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 12/1/2016. Certified copy mailed to the Clerk of Kings County Supreme Court. (Barrett, C)
December 1, 2016 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Nina Gershon:Pre Motion Conference held on 12/1/2016. For the reasons stated on the record, the case is remand to Kings County Supreme Court. (Court Reporter Anthony Mancuso.) (Joe, Victor)
November 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER. The court will hold a conference on 12/1/2016 at 10:00 a.m. to discuss defendant's proposed motion to dismiss. In addition to the issues raised in their letters, the parties should also be prepared to discuss subject matter jurisdiction and, specifically, whether the amount in controversy in this action exceeds $75,000. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 11/17/2016. (Barrett, C)
November 10, 2016 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #9 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. Conference scheduled for December 1, 2016 at 10 AM in courtroom 6D South. Ordered by Judge Nina Gershon on 11/10/2016. (Joe, Victor)
November 10, 2016 Set/Reset Hearings: Pre Motion Conference set for 12/1/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6D South before Judge Nina Gershon. (Joe, Victor)
October 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: As discussed during the 10/24/2016 conference (see attached order for additional detail and deadlines), all discovery must be completed by 7/24/2017. On or before 7/25/2017, the Parties will file a joint status report letter confirming that discovery is complete. On or before 8/23/2017, the Parties will initiate any dispositive motions in accordance with the Individual Rules of the District Judge. On or before 9/15/2017, the Parties will file their joint Proposed Pretrial Order. A Status Conference is set for 3/15/2017 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 504 North before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. On or before 3/8/2017, the Parties will file a joint status report letter, of no more than three pages, identifying any outstanding discovery disputes. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 10/24/2016. (Quinlan, Krista)
October 24, 2016 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon:Initial Conference Hearing held on 10/24/2016 in Room 504 North. Stanislav Sharovskiy appearing for Plaintiff. Kevin Vozzo appearing for Defendant. See separate docket entry for Order issuing from this proceeding. (Tape #11:06-11:30.) (Quinlan, Krista)
October 20, 2016 Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order by Elizabeth Ramos (Sharovskiy, Stanislav)
October 19, 2016 Opinion or Order ORDER denying #11 Defendant's Motion to Adjourn Conference. The 10/24/2016 Initial Conference remains as scheduled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 10/19/2016. (Quinlan, Krista)
October 18, 2016 Filing 11 Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference scheduled for October 24, 2016 until pleadings have been settled by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Vozzo, Kevin)
October 7, 2016 Filing 10 Letter Response to Defendant's Request for Pre-Motion Conference by Elizabeth Ramos (Sharovskiy, Stanislav)
October 6, 2016 Filing 9 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Vozzo, Kevin)
October 6, 2016 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Spurchise, Andrew)
October 6, 2016 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. Spurchise on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Spurchise, Andrew)
October 4, 2016 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanislav Sharovskiy on behalf of Elizabeth Ramos (aty to be noticed) (Sharovskiy, Stanislav)
September 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to Uber Technologies, Inc. Defendant's deadline to answer the Complaint or otherwise move is extended to 10/6/2016. SCHEDULING ORDER: As set forth in the attached Order, an Initial Conference is scheduled for 10/24/2016 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Scanlon in Courtroom 504 North. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to confirm with Defendant's counsel that all necessary participants are aware of this conference. Counsel must complete the attached joint proposed scheduling order and file on ECF no later than 10/20/2016. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon on 9/22/2016. (Quinlan, Krista)
September 21, 2016 Filing 4 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Spurchise, Andrew)
September 15, 2016 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 15, 2016 Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 14, 2016 Case assigned to Judge Nina Gershon and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla)
September 14, 2016 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uber Technologies, Inc. from Kings County Supreme Court, case number 513091/2016. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0207-8911510) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (Spurchise, Andrew) Modified on 9/16/2016 to correct state court index number (Piper, Francine).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramos v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ramos
Represented By: Stanislav Sharovskiy
Represented By: David M. Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin Robert Vozzo
Represented By: Andrew M. Spurchise
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?