Bey v. Chappius et al
| Jamal Salaam Bey |
| Paul Chappius, Deborah S.. Modica, Abdurahmane Hamidou, Lois Bloom, James Bing and Muhmmed Rahman |
| 1:2017cv03592 |
| June 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Roanne L Mann |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT in favor of Abdurahmane Hamidou, Deborah S.. Modica, James Bing, Lois Bloom, Muhmmed Rahman, Paul Chappius against Jamal Salaam Bey. That Pltff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend, 28 USc sec. 1915A(b)(1); 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); that pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; that in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal; and that this case is closed. (Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on 1/8/2018) c/m with Appeals Package sent to Pltff. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915 solely for the purpose of this Order. In line with the foregoing, pltff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, and therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 12/28/17) c/m Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Account Statement. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
| Filing 4 Letter dated 6/27/17 from Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court to Warden or Superintendent, informing that pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915 (as amended 7/26/96), pltff is proceeding in forma pauperis and must pay the total $350 fee by monthly installments deducted from pltff's prison trust fund account (or institutional equivalent). (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 6 Prisoner Authorization filed Jamal Salaam Bey. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jamal Salaam Bey. (Galeano, Sonia) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. Mailed out on 6/16/2017. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Bing, Lois Bloom, Paul Chappius, Abdurahmane Hamidou, Deborah S.. Modica, Muhmmed Rahman, filed by Jamal Salaam Bey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
