Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Johnson v. Chappius
as 24-1225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
Superintendent PAUL CHAPPIUS, Jr., GREGORY KELLER, Deputy Superintendent For Security, Lieutenant TIMOTHY CARROLL and others
Hendrix v. Martuscello
as 24-1129
Plaintiff:
TROY HENDRIX
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, JOHN OR JANE DOES 6-10, members of the DOCCS SHMC as Marcy Correctional Facility, JAMES O'GORMAN, Deputy Commissioner for Correctional Facilities and others
Bess v. Chappius
as 22-3150
Petitioner / Appellant:
Curtis Bess
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Paul Chappius
Gunn v. Abrunzo
as 22-971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Gunn
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Bescler, Correction Officer, Jeffery Claflin, Sergeant, Timothy Perry, Correction Officer and others
Defendant:
William J. Abrunzo, Inmate Grievance Program, Supervisor, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, R.J. Ballard, Lieutenant and others
Ekwegbalu v. Chappius
as 21-1926
Petitioner / Appellant:
Nnonso Ekwegbalu
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul Chappius
Delgado v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Corrections Sergeant G. Hill, Mark . Taylor, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00743
Defendant:
John or Jane Does 11-15, Dr. John Morley, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher v. Chappius et al
as 6:2020cv06330
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Plaintiff:
Johnson Christopher and Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chappius et al
as 1:2020cv00604
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Chappius
as 20-1571
Petitioner / Appellant:
Larry Barton
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul Chappius, Superintendent of Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
