Avanzado et al v. U.S. Postal Service et al
Plaintiff: Khurshedbek Mavlyanov, Mukhamadkosim Musinov and Chelsea D. Avanzado
Defendant: U.S. Postal Service and John Doe
Case Number: 1:2018cv04289
Filed: August 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Vera M Scanlon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2018 Filing 5 Letter by Khurshedbek Mavlyanov (Cerniglia, Francis)
August 28, 2018 Filing 4 Letter Pre-motion Conference by Chelsea D. Avanzado (Buzin, Heath)
August 28, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Heath Buzin on behalf of Chelsea D. Avanzado (aty to be noticed) (Buzin, Heath)
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Avanzado's letter #4 dated August 28, 2018. In light of her consent to Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and the failure of the state court defendants Khurshedbek Mavlyanov and Mukhamadkosim Musinov to respond, the Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss. The common law tort claims Mavlyanov and Musinov asserted in state court against USPS and USPS officials acting within the scope of their employment can only be brought against the United States under the Federal Tort Claim Act, over which federal courts have "exclusive jurisdiction". In re Backer, No. 10-CV-862 (PGG), 2010 WL 2816789, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. July 16, 2010) (citing 28 U.S.C. 1346). As a result, Mavlyanov's and Musinov's claims were properly removed to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1442(a). Because this action was removed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1442(a), this Court's jurisdiction is derivative of the state court's jurisdiction and "[u]nder the doctrine of derivative jurisdiction, a federal court lacks jurisdiction upon removal where the state court from which the action was removed lacked jurisdiction." Id. at *9, 11 (collecting cases). Therefore, this action is dismissed and remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, case number 500353/2018, and the pre-motion conference scheduled for September 11, 2018 is adjourned. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/28/2018. (Hess, Alexandra)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER: Plaintiffs' counsel has failed to obey the Court's order dated August 23, 2018. Plaintiffs' counsel shall show cause by September 4, 2018 as to why they should not be sanctioned $100 each for having twice failed to respond to the USPS's letter as required by the Court. The Court will hold a pre-motion conference on Defendant's proposed motion to dismiss on September 11, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 4F North. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/27/2018. (Hess, Alexandra)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER: Plaintiffs have failed to comply with the Court's Individual Rules requiring a response to Defendants' pre-motion conference request #2 within seven days. Plaintiff shall file a response letter by August 24, 2018. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 8/23/2018. (Hess, Alexandra)
August 15, 2018 Filing 2 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by U.S. Postal Service. (Modafferi, Matthew)
August 8, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Doe, U.S. Postal Service from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Kings, case number 500353/2018. Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Williams, Erica)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avanzado et al v. U.S. Postal Service et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Postal Service
Represented By: Matthew J. Modafferi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Represented By: Matthew J. Modafferi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Khurshedbek Mavlyanov
Represented By: Nancy L. Isserlis, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mukhamadkosim Musinov
Represented By: Nancy L. Isserlis, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea D. Avanzado
Represented By: Oleg Rybak, Esq.
Represented By: Heath Buzin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?