Saquicoray v. Target Corporation
Judith Saquicoray |
Target Corporation |
1:2018cv05833 |
October 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Margo K Brodie |
Sanket J Bulsara |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Civil Case Terminated. (Brucella, Michelle) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Target Corporation (Bojbasa, Michael) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara: An in-person settlement was held on 3/14/2019. A settlement was reached. Parties must file a stipulation of dismissal by 4/18/2019. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/19/2019. (FTR Log #11:18-11:19; 12:34-12:35.) (Murphy, Colleen) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties shall submit a joint certification that discovery has been completed by 9/6/2019. Other deadlines set based on parties' submitted joint discovery worksheet and are reflected in the attached order. An in-person settlement conference will be held on 3/14/2019 at 10:30 A.M. before Magistrate Judge Bulsara in Courtroom 324N. All parties must be present. Parties are to submit their respective ex parte settlement positions via Chamber's email no later than three days before 3/14/2019. Counsel are to refer to the Settlement Section of this Court's Individual Rules in preparation for the conference, which is available on the Courts website. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/07/2018. (Manson, Eddie) |
for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara: An in person Initial Conference was held on 12/07/2018. Counsel for both parties were present.(See separate docket entry for orders issuing from this proceeding.) (FTR Log #10:44-10:53.) (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 7 Proposed Scheduling Order Discovery Plan Worksheet by Target Corporation (Diorio, Samantha) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 10:30 A.M. on 12/07/2018 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara in Courtroom 324N. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 12/07/2018. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 11/19/2018. (Manson, Eddie) |
Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Case assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Mary Diorio on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Diorio, Samantha) Modified on 10/19/2018 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation (Bojbasa, Michael) Modified on 10/19/2018 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Queens, case number 710053/2018. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-10850611) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Bojbasa, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/19/2018: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla). Modified on 10/19/2018 (Bowens, Priscilla). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Saquicoray v. Target Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Corporation | |
Represented By: | Samantha Mary Diorio |
Represented By: | Michael Bojbasa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Judith Saquicoray | |
Represented By: | Warren Adam Zwirn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.