Ferrer v. Aman et al
| Jazleen Ferrer |
| U.S. Postal Service, D&J Car Service, Guy Bejin and William Aman |
| 1:2018cv06301 |
| November 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Steven M Gold |
| Eric N Vitaliano |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE of Interested Parties by D&J Car Service. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (Bornes, Marjorie) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Answer served on all defendants on January 4, 2019, filed by William Aman, D&J Car Service. (Bornes, Marjorie) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , CROSSCLAIM against Guy Bejin, U.S. Postal Service by D&J Car Service, William Aman. (Bornes, Marjorie) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Eric N. Vitaliano and Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE :The proposed summons is rejected; the current form that is on the court's website is to be utilized; Counsel is advised to submit another proposed summons using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet (Davis, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE : Due to the amount of errors made when filing this case, Plaintiff counsel Kurt Robertson is advised to refer to the Attorney Case Opening Video Tutorial/Manual before filing another case electronically. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| NOTICE : The Clerks Office cannot process this case for the following reason; All documents were filed as 1 document. Plaintiff Counsel is directed to refile the civil cover sheet and proposed summons as 2 separate documents. Also the propose summons that was filed is rejected. The current form that is on The Court's website is to be utilized; Counsel is to re-submit both the Civil Cover Sheet and a correct Proposed Summons using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet located under "Other Documents" (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10911129 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Jazleen Ferrer. (Robertson, Kurt) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/16/2018) (Davis, Kimberly). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2018: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
