Saccenti v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Antonietta Saccenti
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 1:2020cv04098
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Brian M Cogan
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Letter to Plaintiff's Counsel re Maintenance Service Company by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER re: #9 . That portion of this Court's Minute Entry and Order of today's date setting a hearing for 9/30/2020 is VACATED. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/23/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Minute Entry and Order for Initial Status Conference held on 9/23/2020 before Judge Brian M. Cogan. Counsel for both sides present by phone. The Court will hold an evidentiary hearing on 9/30/2020 at 2:15 PM to resolve the parties' discovery dispute, unless the parties notify the Court that these issues have been resolved. The Court also set the following discovery schedule: the parties shall exchange their Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures by 10/7/2020; serve interrogatories and written discovery requests by 10/21/2020; respond to interrogatories and produce discovery by 11/20/2020; and complete depositions by 12/20/2020, the date fact discovery ends. Next telephone status conference will be held on 12/23/2020 at 10:00 am. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 and access code 6427877#. (Weisberg, Peggy)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Hearing: Initial Telephone Conference previously set for 9/22/2020 is reset to 9/23/2020 at 10:00 AM. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 and access code 6427877#. (Weisberg, Peggy)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order and Case Management Plan by Target Corporation (Spitz, Alice)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven J. Weissler on behalf of Antonietta Saccenti (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service) (Weissler, Steven)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order ORDER. Initial Status Conference scheduled for 9/22/2020 at 11:00 am will be held by telephone. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852 and access code 6427877# and are further directed to file on the docket a completed case management plan #4 prior to the conference. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/17/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Letter JOINT LETTER UPON THE CONSENT OF COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT, TARGET CORPORATION by Antonietta Saccenti (Weissler, Steven)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 VERIFIED ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation. (Spitz, Alice)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Status Conference is set for 9/22/2020 at 11:00 AM in Chambers 704S. SEE ATTACHED MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONFERENCE. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/3/2020. (Weisberg, Peggy)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly)
September 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court of The State of New York, case number 512370/2020. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ANYEDC-13302546) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Spitz, Alice)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saccenti v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Alice Spitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonietta Saccenti
Represented By: Steven J. Weissler
Represented By: Mark A. Longo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?