Villaran v. Blinken et al
| STEVEN VILLARAN |
| Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Christopher Wray, Richard C. Visek, Ian G. Brownlee and Mark Wells |
| 1:2021cv04270 |
| July 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brian M Cogan |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT that this action is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and fees. ( Ordered by Jalitza Poveda, Deputy Clerk on behalf of Douglas C. Palmer, Clerk of Court on 9/22/2021 ) (Guzzi, Roseann) |
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. ( Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/21/2021 ) *Forwarded for judgment (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal without prejudice respectfully submitted for the Court's endorsement by Antony Blinken, Ian G. Brownlee, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Richard C. Visek, Mark Wells, Christopher Wray (Yim, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for pre motion conference in anticipation of Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) & (b)(6), and request to convert the September 22, 2021 initial status conference to a pre-motion conference by Antony Blinken, Ian G. Brownlee, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, Richard C. Visek, Mark Wells, Christopher Wray. (Yim, Kevin) |
|
ORDER denying #7 Motion as unnecessary. The premotion conference is waived. This letter is deemed to constitute defendants' motion to dismiss on the grounds stated. Plaintiff must file opposition, if there is any, by 10/5/2021. The Initial Status Conference is adjourned to 10/7/2021 at 1:00 pm and the Court will hold oral argument on the motion. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 4270#. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/20/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Villaran. Antony Blinken served on 8/9/2021, answer due 10/8/2021; Ian G. Brownlee served on 8/9/2021, answer due 10/8/2021; Merrick Garland served on 8/9/2021, answer due 10/8/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 8/5/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; Tracy Renaud served on 8/5/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; Richard C. Visek served on 8/9/2021, answer due 10/8/2021; Mark Wells served on 8/9/2021, answer due 10/8/2021; Christopher Wray served on 8/9/2021, answer due 10/8/2021. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Yim on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Yim, Kevin) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to appear before the Honorable Brian M. Cogan for a telephonic Initial Status Conference on 9/22/2021 at 10:30 am. Parties are directed to use the toll-free number 888-684-8852, access code 6427877# and security code 4270#. Principal trial counsel must appear at this and all subsequent conferences. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to notify all attorneys in this action of the conference schedule in writing. No later than 24 hours prior to the Initial Status Conference, the Government must file a brief letter advising the Court whether the status of the case has changed since the filing of the complaint. Counsel is directed to review Judge Cogan's Individual Practices, which may be obtained on the Court's website at https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/content/judge-brian-m-cogan. Requests for adjournment of the conference will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Judge Cogan's Rules. Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 8/2/2021. (Weisberg, Peggy)
|
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Brian M. Cogan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF and PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14706133 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by STEVEN VILLARAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
