Walker v. Carter et al
| Ross Daniel Walker |
| Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Tauheedepps, Sean John Combs and William Leonard Roberts, II |
| 1:2022cv02371 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Ann M Donnelly |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. The complaints are dismissed as frivolous, with leave to amend. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this order to the plaintiff and to note the mailing on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The plaintiff may file amended complaints within 30 days of the date of this order. Each amended complaint must bear the caption, Amended Complaint. The amended complaints must have the correct docket numbers 22-CV-2369 and 22-CV-2371, respectively. If the plaintiff does not file amended complaints within that time, judgment dismissing these actions will enter. The plaintiff has filed seven cases in this Court in less than a month. See Walker v. Child Protective Servs., No. 22-CV-2132 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2022) (transferred to the Eastern District of California); Walker v. Brookdale Plaza, No. 22-CV-2133 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2022) (dismissed with leave to amend); Walker v. TransUnion, No. 22-CV-2246 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 18, 2022); Walker v. Jack in the Box, No. 22-CV-2369 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2022); Walker v. Kings County Hospital, No. 22-CV-2370 (filed Apr. 21, 2022); Walker v. Carter, No. 22-CV-2371 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2022); Walker v. Tulare County, No. 22-CV-2372 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2022). The plaintiff is cautioned that this Court will not tolerate abuse of its judicial resources or frivolous litigation, and that he may be subject to a filing injunction in this district if he continues to file similar actions. Lau v. Meddaugh, 229 F.3d 121, 123 (2d Cir. 2000). Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 5/17/2022. (Greene, Donna)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ross Daniel Walker. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ross Daniel Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
