Cases
Dixon v. Carter
as 2:2023cv12767
Plaintiff: Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr. and Stoic
Defendant: Shawn Jay-z Carter, Shawn Carter and Jay-Z
Jordan v. Carter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff: Terrell D. Jordan and Tracy D. Halsell
Defendant: Shawn Jay Z Carter, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Parkwood Entertainment LLC and others
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Howard v. Carter
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff: Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant: Shawn Jay-Z Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Carter
as 22-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jermaine Jevon Howard, "Chooie"
Defendant / Appellee: Shawn Jay-Z Carter, (Rocafella Records)
Defendant: Kareem Biggs Burke, (Rocafella Records) and Damon Dame Dash, (Rocafella Records)
Walker v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff: Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant: Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Tauheedepps, Sean John Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Carter et al
as 1:2020cv00417
Plaintiff: Jermaine Jevon Howard
Defendant: Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Damon Dame Dash and Kareem Biggs Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Cassagnol v. New Jersey Basketball, LLC
as 16-3275
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dr. Francois De Cassagnol
Defendant - Appellee: New Jersey Basketball, LLC, Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Dev. Bruce Ratner, and affliated companies and others
Jones v. Stefani Joanne Angelina et al
as 1:2016cv00966
Plaintiff: Cheareen Jones
Defendant: Stefani Joanne Angelina, Stacy Ann Ferguson, William James Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
De Cassagnol v. New Jersey Basketball LLC et al
as 1:2013cv06929
Defendant: Dev. Bruce Ratner, Shawn Jay-Z Carter, NBA, NJNets and NBAP and others
Plaintiff: Dr. Francois De Cassagnol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?