Garcia et al v. City of New York et al
| Robert E. Garcia, Sr., Lance Cruell, Jamir Riviere, Brandon Brickhouse, Lukel Delbeau, Luis Rodriguez, Keron Alexis, Omari Williams, Phillip Primus, Luis Aguilar, Careem William, Donta Kennedy, Micsaiah Dunn, Rameses Smith, Damien Grimes, Robert Benjamin, Tylik Bowman, Jairo Pereira, Bobby Thomas, Jashawn Robinson, Messiah Brown and Nylique Knight |
| City of New York and Legal Aid Society |
| 1:2022cv05086 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lois Bloom |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), any appeal would not be taken in good faith; and that in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962).Signed by Brenna B. Mahoney, Clerk of Court By J. Poveda, Deputy Clek on 10/20/2022. (c/m w/appeals packet to Robert E. Garcia Sr. and Lance Cruell at the address listed on the docket sheet) (ML) |
ORDER: granting Plaintiffs' Robert E. Garcia, Sr. #4 and Lance Cruell #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See DE#6 . Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 10/19/2022. (ML)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's case. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 10/19/2022. (SK)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by pro se Lance Cruell. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by pro se Robert E. Garcia, Sr. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency) (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York, Legal Aid Society, filed by Phillip Primus, Bobby Thomas, Lukel Delbeau, Damien Grimes, Lance Cruell, Jashawn Robinson, Robert E. Garcia, Sr, Robert Benjamin, Rameses Smith, Messiah Brown, Brandon Brickhouse, Keron Alexis, Luis Aguilar, Micsaiah Dunn, Donta Kennedy, Jairo Pereira, Luis Rodriguez, Nylique Knight, Tylik Bowman, Jamir Riviere. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
