Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Adfield v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2025cv04516
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin Adfield
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Stout v. Bertsch et al
as 3:2025cv00250
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin Stout
Defendant:
Officer Bertsch and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Brown et al
as 1:2025cv00577
Plaintiff:
Albert Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Ward Brown, Thomas E. Brennan, Mark E. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
See v. Warden
as 3:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin See
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Mahan
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT BENJAMIN MAHAN, II
BEST v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12375
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BENJAMIN BEST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Stout v. Sergeant Johnson
as 22-1957
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BENJAMIN STOUT
Defendant:
SERGEANT JOHNSON, Individually and in his/her official capacity, DEPUTY NOBLES, Individually and in his/her official capacity and KING GEORGE COUNTY SHERIFF, Official capacity
Garcia et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05086
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Garcia, Sr., Lance Cruell, Jamir Riviere and others
Defendant:
City of New York and Legal Aid Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
