Brown v. Target Corporation et al
| Troy Brown |
| Target Corporation and Trei Green |
| 1:2022cv05621 |
| September 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sanket J Bulsara |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
RE-SCHEDULING ORDER: The initial conference scheduled for 12/16/2022 will now take place at 10:30 A.M. before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274. The access code is 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the conference. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report #9 and electronically file same with the Court no later than 12/14/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 11/17/2022. (EM)
|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Troy Brown. (Pierguidi, David) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER: A telephonic initial conference will be held at 2:30 P.M. on 12/16/2022 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties are directed to call the toll-free number 877-336-1274; access code is 6534420. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Rule 26(f) Report and electronically file same with the Court no later than 12/13/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the Rule 26(f) Report, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. Upon receipt of this email counsel shall confirm with each other of the date and time of this telephonic initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/21/2022. (EM)
|
|
ORDER: Plaintiff may reply to defendants opposition papers at #7 and #8 by 11/2/2022. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/19/2022. (de Carvalho, Simon)
|
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 Memorandum in Opposition in response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court , AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court In Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, RESPONSE to Motion re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court , MEMORANDUM in Support , REPLY in Opposition filed by All Defendants. (Spitz, Alice) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by All Defendants. (Spitz, Alice) |
|
ORDER: Defendants are directed to respond to plaintiff's motion to remand at #6 by 10/19/2022. Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 10/5/2022. (de Carvalho, Simon)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Troy Brown. (Attachments: #1 Declaration David Pierguidi, Esq., #2 Exhibit A (State Court Complaint), #3 Exhibit B (Removal Notice), #4 Memorandum in Support) (Pierguidi, David) |
| Filing 5 VERIFIED ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by All Defendants. (Spitz, Alice) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David John Pierguidi on behalf of Troy Brown (aty to be noticed) (Pierguidi, David) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court of The State of New York, case number 716977/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15958339) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (Spitz, Alice) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Davis, Kimberly) |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Davis, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
