Orihuela v. Target Corporation
| Alida Nora Orihuela |
| Target Corporation |
| 1:2024cv02233 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Hector Gonzalez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to file on the docket a joint letter describing the case and a completed civil case management plan by May 1, 2024, as further described in the attached mandatory requirements. The parties' joint letter shall include a description of any discovery that has already been conducted in state court prior to Defendant's removal of this case.Requests for adjournment of the deadline for these submissions will be considered only if made in writing and otherwise in accordance with Section I.D of the Court's Individual Practices. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/27/2024. (PN)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Nicole Pietkewicz on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Pietkewicz, Erin) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (KD) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (KD) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation (Crowley, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation (Crowley, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Supreme Court, Queens County, case number 717260/2023. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-17711683) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Verified Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Target's Verified Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Preliminary Conference Order, #4 Exhibit D - Compliance Conference Order, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's Response to Combined Demands, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Affidavit of Service) (Crowley, Michael) |
|
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a letter no longer than three pages on or before April 3, 2024, explaining Plaintiff's position regarding whether this case was properly removed from state court. Plaintiff's letter must address not only whether the Court has diversity or federal question jurisdiction over the claims at issue in this case, but also whether Defendants complied with the procedural requirements for removal, including the requirements in 28 U.S.C. 1446. Defendant may file a responsive letter no longer than three pages on or before April 10, 2024.If Plaintiff's letter indicates that removal was improper, the Court will likely take under consideration whether to remand this case based solely on the parties' letters, without affording Defendant the opportunity further to brief the issue, regardless of whether Defendant files a responsive letter. Ordered by Judge Hector Gonzalez on 3/27/2024. (PN)
|
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (KD) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Hector Gonzalez. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (KD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Orihuela v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alida Nora Orihuela | |
| Represented By: | Joanna Plonska |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Crowley |
| Represented By: | Erin Nicole Pietkewicz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
