DiPetto v. U.S. Postal Service
| John DiPetto |
| U.S. Postal Service |
| 2:2008cv04927 |
| December 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Nassau |
| Arlene R. Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed: (1) to substitute Patrick R. Donahoe in place of John E. Potter as Defendant, (2) enter judgment and mark this matter as CLOSED, and (3) mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/16/2014. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Human Rights Law claims are dismissed, as are his Title VII claims against Defendants Louie and Lim. His Title VII claims against Defendant Potter, as Postmaster General of the United States, may proceed in accordance with the following guidance. Subject to any further direction from Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay, Plaintiff and the Postal Service shall engage in limited discovery on the issues of (1) whether Plaintiff's failure to follow through with the EEO procedure precludes his claims, and (2) whether Plaintiff's claims are time-barred. The parties shall inform the Court when that discovery is complete, and, at that time, the Court will entertain a request from Defendant Potter for leave to move for summary judgment on either or both of these two issues. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/14/11. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court finds that Pltff has failed to meet the lenient pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/21/09. C/M; C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DiPetto v. U.S. Postal Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John DiPetto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Postal Service | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
