Kumar v. Holder et al
| Aman Kumar |
| Department of Homeland Security, Eric H. Holder, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Napolitano, Andrea Quarantillo and United States Citizenship & Immigration Services |
| 2:2012cv05261 |
| October 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Sandra J. Feuerstein |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 287 Petition to Enforce INS Subpoena |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that petitioner take nothing of respondent; that respondents motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted; that the petition is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and that this case is hereby closed. (Florio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION & ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. SO ORDERED that respondents' motion to dismiss the petition pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted and the petition is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 11/18/2013. (Florio, Lisa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
