Stair et al v. Calhoun et al
Plaintiff: Theodore Stair
Defendant: Rory Calhoun, H. Linwood Gilbert, John Hanrahan and Robert E. Parella
Counter Claimant: Rory Calhoun, John Hanrahan and Robert E. Parella
Counter Defendant: Theodore Stair
Case Number: 2:2012cv06121
Filed: December 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Central Islip Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: Gary R. Brown
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER granting [87, 89] Motions for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis: For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's Motions for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis are granted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 11/16/2016. c/m to pro se Pltf and Dfts. (Cea, Christine)
September 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. Plaintiff's cross-motion for sanctions is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/16/2016. (Cea, Christine)
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER: SO ORDERED that plaintiffs request for an extension of time to serve Gilbert is denied and plaintiffs claims against Gilbert are dismissed in their entirety pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. H. Linwood Gilbert terminated. CM to pro se plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/4/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER denying 65 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed on appeal in formapauperis is denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(4) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the Clerkof the Cour t shall serve notice of entry of this order upon all parties and immediately notify theUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit of this decision. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(5) ofthe Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, inter alia, plaintiff may file a motion for leave to proceedon appeal in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit withinthirty (30) days after the Clerk of this Court serves notice of entry of this order upon him. CM to pro se plaintiff. CM to 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals via ecf/nef. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/1/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
March 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: SO ORDERED that For the reasons set forth herein, so much of the Report as (1) finds (a) that Parella and Hanrahan waived the defense of insufficient service of process for purposes of challenging plaintiffs attempt to invoke the protection of CPLR 205(a), (Report at 12), (b) that the correct termination date is July 10, 2012, the date judgment was entered [by the Clerk of the Court], (Report at 10), and (c) that the process servers affidavit of service established on its face that Parella was served within the sixty (60)-day limitations period prescribed by CPLR 205(a); and (2) recommends that Parellas motion for summary judgment be denied, are rejected, and the Report is otherwise accepted in its entirety. F or the reasons set forth herein and in the Report, (1) the branches of defts motion seeking dismissal of plaintiffs claims against Calhoun and Parella pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are granted and plaintiffs claims again st Calhoun and Parella are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice as time barred, and defts motion is otherwise denied; and (2) plaintiff must show cause, by serving and filing an affidavit on or before April 30, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed against Gilbert for his failure to serve the summons and complaint upon him within the time prescribed by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Pursuant to Rule 77(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk of the Court shall serve notice of entry of this Order and Order to Show Cause upon all parties as provided in Rule 5(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and record such service on the docket. CM to pro se parties. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 3/31/2015. (Florio, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stair et al v. Calhoun et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Rory Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: John Hanrahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Robert E. Parella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rory Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H. Linwood Gilbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Hanrahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert E. Parella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Theodore Stair
Represented By: Susan Schneiderman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theodore Stair
Represented By: Susan Schneiderman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?