Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Stair v. Calhoun
as 7:2018cv00147
Defendant:
Rory Calhoun, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stair v. Calhoun
as 16-3700
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Theodore Stair, Individually, an Officer, Director and Shareholder of American Virgin Enterprises, Ltd., Derivatively on behalf of American Virgin Enterprises, Inc., a Member of Sirius Development, LLC, derivatively on behalf of Sirius Development, LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Rory Calhoun, Robert E. Parella and John Hanrahan
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Linwood Gilbert
Stair v. Calhoun
as 16-3574
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Theodore Stair, Individually, an Officer, Director and Shareholder of American Virgin Enterprises, Ltd., Derivatively on behalf of American Virgin Enterprises, Inc., a Member of Sirius Development, LLC, derivatively on behalf of Sirius Development, LLC
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Rory Calhoun, Robert E. Parella and John Hanrahan
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Linwood Gilbert
Stair et al v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2012cv06121
Counter Claimant:
Rory Calhoun, John Hanrahan and Robert E. Parella
Defendant:
Rory Calhoun, H. Linwood Gilbert, John Hanrahan and others
Counter Defendant:
Theodore Stair, Theodore Stair and Theodore Stair
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stair, Theodore Stair and Theodore Stair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stair et al v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2007cv03906
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stair, Theodore Stair and Theodore Stair
Defendant:
Rory Calhoun, John Hanrahan, Robert E. Parella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stairs v. State Of Florida et al
as 2:2007cv00086
Petitioner:
Marc Theodore Stairs
Respondent:
State Of Florida and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
