Keyes v. The Department of Social Services et al
||Keysean L Keyes
||Merly Berkowitz, County Court, Jeffrey Groder, John E Imof, David Sullivan, Supreme Court and The Department of Social Services
||March 23, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
||Central Islip Office
||Steven I. Locke
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 30, 2017
MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel; For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's New Complaints are sua sponte DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Plain tiff is cautioned that similar, future complaints will not be tolerated. If Plaintiff persists in this course of action, the Court will require, under the All Writs Act, that Plaintiff first seek leave of Court before submitting such filings. Given the DISMISSAL of the New Complaints, Plaintiff's application for the appointment of pro bono counsel to represent her in 17-CV-1784 is DENIED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE these cases and to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/30/2017. C/M (Valle, Christine)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?