Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v. Shenzhen Jinri Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd. et. al.
| Kiss Nail Products, Inc. |
| Shenzen Jinri Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd., John Doe 1, Shenzhen Jinri Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd., Shenzhen Jinri Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd. doing business as VAV doing business as Vivid & Vogue and John Doe 1 doing business as Ropalia |
| 2:2018cv05625 |
| October 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Pamela K Chen |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Shenzhen Jinri Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd.. (Barrett, C) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. by Kiss Nail Products, Inc. (Ackerman, Paul) |
| CASE REASSIGNED INTO PATENT PILOT PROGRAM. Case reassigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen for all further proceedings. Judge Joseph F. Bianco no longer assigned to case (Davis, Kimberly) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Proposed summons is rejected; the section that reads "To: (Defendant's name and address)" has not been fully completed (Please include aliases for Defendant); the Clerk's Office cannot issue the summons. Counsel is advised to submit a completed proposed summons using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joseph F. Bianco and Magistrate Judge Gary R. Brown. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against John Doe 1, Shenzhen Jinri Electrical Appliance Co. Ltd. filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-10801406 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Kiss Nail Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A to Complaint, #4 Exhibit B to Complaint, #5 Exhibit C to Complaint, #6 AO 120 Form) (Ackerman, Paul) Modified on 10/11/2018 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
