Williams v. Saul
| Christopher Williams |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv03435 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Anne Zeigler on behalf of Andrew Saul (aty to be noticed) (Zeigler, Anne) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Upon review of the in forma pauperis application, the Court finds that plaintiff's financial status qualifies plaintiff to commence this action without prepayment of the filling fee. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Counsel is directed to serve the complaint on defendant. Defendant shall serve the administrative record on plaintiff by November 19, 2020, but shall not file the record on ECF until the motion is fully briefed. Defendant shall serve a motion by January 19, 2021; Plaintiff shall serve a response to Defendant's motion, and any cross-motion, by March 22, 2021; and Defendant shall serve its reply and file the fully briefed motion, including the administrative transcript, on ECF, by April 12, 2021. Counsel is advised that on March 2, 2020, the Commissioner of Social Security filed a notice in the Federal Register setting forth the names and current addresses for service of process on the Commissioner in disability cases for each United States District Court. See https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/02/2020-04246/notice-announcing-addresses-for-service-of-process. The Notice announced that service of process for the Eastern District of New York was directed to be made upon the Regional Chief Counsel's Office in Kansas City, Missouri. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 8/21/2020. (Simmons, James)
|
| Filing 6 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit AO239) (Rosch, Darlene) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: For the reasons that follow (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice and with leave to renew upon filing the Long Form within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. Alternatively, plaintiff may remit the $400.00 filing fee. Plaintiff is cautioned that a failure to timely comply with this Order will lead to the dismissal of the complaint without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 8/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (AO 239)) (Ortiz, Grisel) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/10/2020) (Ortiz, Grisel).
|
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support IFP, #2 Proposed Order IFP) (Rosch, Darlene) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Christopher Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons ) (Rosch, Darlene) Modified on 7/30/2020 (Landow, Concetta). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Anne Zeigler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Williams | |
| Represented By: | Darlene Rosch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
