Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC) Farrow v. Warden et al
as 2:2026cv02550
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Farrow
Defendant:
Warden and Carsoner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. BLIZZARD et al
as 3:2026cv04714
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM KNIGHT
Defendant:
JUSTIN BLIZZARD, CODY TYLER OWENS, CHRISTOPHER GAGE BAILY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHT v. ADKISON et al
as 3:2026cv04709
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM KNIGHT
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and MICHAEL ADKISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chang v. Saunders, et al.
as 26-4301
Plaintiff:
VICKI CHANG, and minor J. C.
Defendant:
CHARLES SAUNDERS, MIHAELA SAUNDERS, KIM CORNELL and others
Tolhurst v. Bisignano
as 7:2026cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Tolhurst
Defendant:
Frank J. Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Melchor v. Wilcheck
as 4:2026cv05028
Plaintiff:
Jose Alonso Zapata Melchor
Defendant:
Christopher William Wilcheck and Halter Tree Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Farrow v. Warden, Mule Creek et al
as 3:2026cv03623
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Farrow
Defendant:
Warden, Mule Creek and Correctional Officer Carsoner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
