Linden v. Target Corporation
| Judith Linden |
| Target Corporation |
| 2:2020cv04975 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Nicholas G Garaufis |
| Steven I Locke |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sal F. DeLuca on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (DeLuca, Sal) |
| Filing 8 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke: Motion Hearing held on 3/3/2021. Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order, DE #5 , is GRANTED. In balancing the competing interests of the parties, the Court concludes that good cause exists for an order permitting Defendant Target Corporation to withhold the video footage at issue until after Plaintiff's deposition. See Poppo v. AON Risk Servs., Inc., No. 00-cv-4165, 2000 WL 1800746, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2000) (noting that "Second Circuit courts have delayed the production of audio or video tapes prior to one or more depositions in order to prevent the defendant or its witnesses from tailoring their testimony to conform with their prior recorded statements or actions"). Accordingly, the Court grants Defendant's motion for a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Defendant shall produce the video footage at issue within 24 hours of Plaintiff's deposition. (Reilly, Megan) |
Electronic SCHEDULING ORDER: Motion Hearing as to DE #5 , Defendant's Motion for a Protective Order, is set for 3/3/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. The hearing will be conducted through the AT&T teleconference center; parties should dial 1-877-336-1829 and enter access code 3002871# at the prompt.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 2/2/2021. (Reilly, Megan)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION for Protective Order permitting defendant to withhold exchanging a copy of video footage, until after plaintiffs deposition filed by Judith Linden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Jean-Jacques, Michelle) |
|
Electronic ORDER granting DE #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. On consent, the deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to Defendant's Motion for Protective Order, DE #5 , is extended to and including 1/11/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 1/6/2021. (Reilly, Megan)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION for Protective Order permitting defendant to withhold exchanging a copy of video footage, until after plaintiffs deposition by Judith Linden. (Jean-Jacques, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Protective Order permitting defendant to withhold exchanging a copy of video footage, until after plaintiffs deposition by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - S&C, #2 Exhibit B - Gormley v. Target Order, #3 Exhibit C - Quintero v. Costco Order, #4 Exhibit D - Miller v. The Cheesecake Factory Order, #5 Exhibit E - Fallica-Risteff v. Target Order, #6 Exhibit F - Lang v. Wal-Mart Stores Order, #7 Exhibit G - Caruso v. Target Order, #8 Exhibit H - Poppo v. AON Risk Servs. Memo & Order, #9 Exhibit I - Valenza v. Target Order) (Leibowitz, Allison) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Jean-Jacques on behalf of Judith Linden (aty to be noticed) (Jean-Jacques, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Supreme Court, Nassau County, case number 609431/2020. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYEDC-13535280) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - S&C, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Exhibit C - E-mail correspondence, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certificate of Service) (Leibowitz, Allison) Modified on 10/16/2020 (Rodin, Deanna). |
| This case has been opened in the Eastern District of New York. If you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Linden v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Judith Linden | |
| Represented By: | Mark J. Linder |
| Represented By: | Michelle Jean-Jacques |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Allison C. Leibowitz |
| Represented By: | Sal F. DeLuca |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
