Delmar v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Adriana Delmar
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv00404
Filed: January 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Arlene R Lindsay
Referring Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2022 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Adriana Delmar. Target Corporation waiver sent on 2/17/2022, answer due 4/18/2022. (Friedman, Joshua)
March 8, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard C White on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (White, Richard)
March 8, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sanjeeve Kumar DeSoyza on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (DeSoyza, Sanjeeve)
January 25, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Target Corporation. (Flanagan, Doreen)
January 25, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
January 25, 2022 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
January 25, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)
January 24, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Target Corporation filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15222686, filed by Adriana Delmar. Was the Disclosure Statement on the Civil Cover Sheet completed - No. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue) (Friedman, Joshua) Modified on 1/25/2022 (Flanagan, Doreen).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Delmar v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adriana Delmar
Represented By: Joshua Mathew Friedman
Represented By: Joseph A. Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Sanjeeve Kumar DeSoyza
Represented By: Richard C White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?