Quijano v. Target Corporation et al
| Santa Quijano |
| Target Corporation and XYZ Inc. |
| 2:2023cv07813 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| LaShann DeArcy Hall |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. The parties' joint request to extend all discovery deadlines for 30 days to allow continued settlement discussions is granted. In the event this action does not settle the parties are directed to file a revised Rule 26(f) report no later than January 15, 2024. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 12/11/2023. (BJ)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (joint request) by Target Corporation. (Hill, Amanda) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Hill, Amanda) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (DeLuca, Sal) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by November 23, 2023. See the attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 10/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(f) form) c/ecf (RI)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Marie Hill on behalf of Target Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Hill, Amanda) |
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (LJ) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Target Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (DeLuca, Sal) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation (DeLuca, Sal) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Supreme Nassau, case number 618175/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-17200670) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - S&C, #2 Exhibit B - Verified Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Response, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (DeLuca, Sal) Modified on 10/19/2023 (LJ). |
| Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
