Franzese et al v. Target Corporation
| Raffale Franzese and Maria M. Franzese |
| Target Corporation |
| 2:2024cv01612 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Lee G Dunst |
| Nina R Morrison |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Proposed Scheduling Order by Target Corporation (Hannon, Ian) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Initial Conference scheduled for 5/2/2024 at 3:30PM will be held via Zoom. The Court will email a Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. This Zoom conference will be a public proceeding; nonparties are welcome to attend via telephone. To receive a telephone invitation, nonparties may contact Judge Dunst's Chambers at (631) 712-5760. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 4/19/2024. (CT)
|
| Filing 6 STATE COURT RECORD Received. (JVC) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court will hold an Initial Conference on 5/2/2024 at 3:30PM in Courtroom 830 of the Alfonse M. D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Central Islip. The parties are directed to follow Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rules, which are available on the Court's website, and submit a proposed discovery plan/scheduling order at least five business days prior to the initial conference pursuant to Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rule IV.A.1. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 3/6/2024. (CT)
|
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice Re: Consent. A United States Magistrate Judge has been assigned to this case and is available to conduct all proceedings. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent.The form may also be accessed at the following link: #https://img.nyed.uscourts.gov/files/forms/MJConsentForm.pdf (LJ) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (LJ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn E Auletta on behalf of Maria M. Franzese, Raffale Franzese (notification declined or already on case) (Auletta, Glenn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Leon DellaUniversita on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (DellaUniversita, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Nina R. Morrison and Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (LJ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from Supreme Court, Suffolk County, case number 601257/2024. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANYEDC-17630755) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit S&C, #2 Exhibit answer, #3 Exhibit response to Demand Pursuant to CPLR 3017(c), #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Hannon, Ian) Modified on 3/5/2024 (LJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
