Streck et al v. Board of Education of the East Greenbush Central School District et al
| 1:2004cv00202 |
| February 26, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| David R. Homer |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1981 Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER, that plaintiffs are awarded $8,640.00 in reimbursement for Mr. Streck's compensatory reading program and independent neuropsychological evaluation. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 7/16/2009. (jel, )
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 60 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees is denied with leave to renew; ORDERED that parties are instructed to file briefs not to exceed 6 pages and whatever ev idence they have addressing the value of Mr. Streck's compensatory reading program within 30 days of the date of this order, which briefing shall also address the status of the District's prior payment to plaintiff's. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 5/14/09. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Streck et al v. Board of Education of the East Greenbush Central School District et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
