O'Connell v. Barnhart
| 1:2006cv01113 |
| September 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| David R. Homer |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part; ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Judgment on the pl eadings is DENIED; ORDERED that the complaint is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report-Recommendation; ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY re 16 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/9/09. (ban)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommending that Plaintiff's # 7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be granted in part and denied in part, and that the # 1 Complaint be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 2/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 2/11/09. (jmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: O'Connell v. Barnhart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
