Wynn v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Case Number: 1:2006cv01145
Filed: September 22, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Scullin
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: GRANTING Defendant's 12 Motion for Sanctions in that Plaintiff shall pay Defendant the sum of $400 for reasonable attorney fees within thirty days of this Order; ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve his Respon ses to Defendant's Demands and expert disclosure on or before 2/11/08; ORDERED, that the Uniform Pretrial Scheduling Order shall be amended as follows: (1) discovery deadline is 4/11/08; (2) the final day to file dispositive motions is 5/23/08; (3) Defendant's expert disclosure is due on or before 3/10/08; (4) After the exchange of expert disclosures, the parties may depose the experts but said expert depositions shall be completed before 4/11/08; (5) All other provisions of the Scheduling Order shall remain in effect; and (6) No further extensions will be considered.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 2/5/08. (sg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wynn v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?