VanBrocklen v. United States of America et al
| Russell VanBrocklen |
| United States of America and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) |
| 1:2008cv00312 |
| March 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Federal Employer's Liability Office |
| Rensselaer |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltf's 38 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting Deft's 41 Motion for Reconsideration, and dismissing Pltf's remaining Fourth Amendment claim ; denying as moot Pltf's 49 Letter Request. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 4/7/10. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
32
DECISION AND ORDER denying Govt's 25 Motion for Reconsideration and denying Pltf's 29 Motion to amend the complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 5/21/09. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
19
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 Motion to Dismiss, 11 Letter Request and 15 Motion to Dismiss. All claims are dismissed except Pltf's Fourth Amendment Claim contained in the original Complaint. Pltf's common law tort claims are dismissed without prejudice to re-pleading. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/26/09. (sfp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
