Lewis v. Mollette et al
| Jermaine Lewis |
| Eddie Mollette, Michael Gavin, Felicia Keller, John Bahret, Nate Lassic, John Doe 1-10 and Jane Doe 1-10 |
| 1:2008cv00614 |
| June 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Ulster |
| David R. Homer |
| David N. Hurd |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER: Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED; The complaint against defendants John Bahret and Nate Lassic is DISMISSED on consent of the parties; The First Cause of Action (Deprivation of Rights) insofar as it allege s a violation of the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments is DISMISSED on consent of the parties; The Fourth Cause of Action (Supervisory Liability) is DISMISSED on consent of the parties; The First (Deprivation of Rights) insofar as it alleges a viol ation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments; Second (Excessive Force); and Third (Failure to Intervene) Causes of Action against defendants Eddie Mollette and Michael Gavin remain for trial. The names of defendants Felicia Keller, John Bahret, Nate Lassic, and John and Jane Doe 1-10 shall be removed from the title of the action. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/24/2010. (see)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
