Stringer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Northern District Stringer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Stringer v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Brenda Stringer
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2008cv00694
Filed:	July 3, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Albany
Presiding Judge:	Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 4, 2010	Filing 14 DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, Defendants Motion for Judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, Plaintiffs cross-Motion for Judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and REMANDED for reconsideration consistent with the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 04, 2010. (sas)
December 2, 2009	Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Brenda Stringer.It is recommended that Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings should be DENIED; Plaintiffs cross motion for judgment on the pleadings should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and REMANDED for reconsideration. Objections to R&R due by 12/16/2009 Case Review Deadline 12/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 12/2/09. (mnm)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 4, 2010

Filing 14 DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, Defendants Motion for Judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, Plaintiffs cross-Motion for Judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and REMANDED for reconsideration consistent with the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 04, 2010. (sas)

December 2, 2009

Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Brenda Stringer.It is recommended that Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings should be DENIED; Plaintiffs cross motion for judgment on the pleadings should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and REMANDED for reconsideration. Objections to R&R due by 12/16/2009 Case Review Deadline 12/23/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 12/2/09. (mnm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stringer v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda Stringer
Represented By:	Thomas C. Erwin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?