Abramo et al v. Teal, Becker & Chiaramonte, CPA'S, P.C. et al
| Richard J. Abramo, Robert V. Brown and John A. Tomassetti |
| Teal, Becker & Chiaramonte, CPA'S, P.C. and James W. Drislane, CPA |
| 1:2009cv00269 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
| Albany |
| David R. Homer |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 25) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 30, 2011. (sas)
|
|
Filing
23
DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for leave to appeal (Dkt. No. 20) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 04, 2011. (sas)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 5) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Claim One is DISMISSED with prejudice as to that portion predicated on alleged negligenc e barred by the applicable statute of limitations and without prejudice as to that portion of the claim which is not time-barred; and it is further ORDERED, that Claims Two, Three, Four and Five are DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 12, 2010. (sas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
