Shear Contractors, Inc. v. Shear Enterprises & General Contracting et al
| Shear Contractors, Inc. |
| Shear Enterprises & General Contracting and Thomas Shear |
| 1:2009cv00621 |
| June 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Schenectady |
| David R. Homer |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| None |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT in favor of Shear Enterprises & General Contracting, Thomas Shear against Shear Contractors, Inc.. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Shear Contractors' motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. That defendants Shear Enterprises and Thomas Shear's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Shear Contractors' complaint is DISMISSED. That Shear Enterprises's request for attorneys' fees is DENIED, in accordance with the Memorandum-Decision and Order issued by U.S. District Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/16/10. (ban)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 25 Motion TRO; granting 29 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that plaintiff Shear Contractors' motion for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. ORDERED that defendants Shear Enterprises and Thomas Shear's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Shear Contractors' complaint is DISMISSED. ORDERED that Shear Enterprises request for attorneys' fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 11/16/10. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
