Monell v. The Scooter Store, LTD et al
| Delevine Monell |
| The Scooter Store, LTD and Pride Mobility Products Corporation |
| 1:2010cv00897 |
| July 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Ulster |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT Dismissing Action Based Upon Settlement. Signed by Judge Mae A. D'Agostino, 12/18/2012. (ban)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion to exclude Plaintiff's expert is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' ; motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' counsel shall initiate a telephone conference, using a professional conferencing service, with the Court and Plaintiff's coun sel on Tuesday, October 2, 2012, at 11:00 a.m., to discuss a schedule for the trial of this matter; and the Court furtherORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 9/14/12. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
