Barber v. Ruzzo et al
Daniel W. Barber |
Timothy J. Ruzzo, Margaret L. McMullen and Michael Spitz |
1:2010cv01198 |
October 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
Columbia |
David R. Homer |
Gary L. Sharpe |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That Ruzzo's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Barber's Complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/12/2013. (jel, ) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER that the defendants' 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Margaret L. McMullen, Timothy J. Ruzzo, Michael Spitz is GRANTED in part as to: 1. All claims against defendants in their official capacities; 2. All claims agains t McMullen and Spitz in their individual capacities; 3. Barber's first, second, fourth and fifth causes of action against Ruzzo in his individual capacity. That defendants motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 8) is DENIED with respect to Barber's c laim of malicious prosecution against Ruzzo in his individual capacity. That McMullen and Spitz are terminated as parties. That Barber's motion to supplemet his pleadings (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED as moot. That Ruzzo file the appropriate resonsive pleadings with the time allotted by the rules. That the parties notify Magistrate Judge Homer in order to schedule further proceedings in accordance with this order. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 10/19/2011. (jel, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.