Berkshire Bank v. Tedeschi
Plaintiff: Berkshire Bank
Defendant: Nancy K. Tedeschi
Case Number: 1:2011cv00767
Filed: July 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Albany Office
County: Saratoga
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: David R. Homer
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 109 STIPULATION & ORDER OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on November 13, 2017. (sas)
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 61 DECISION and ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 57) for an order to show cause is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs request for attorneys fees is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 15, 2016. (sas)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Second Motion for attorneys fees and costs (Dkt. No. 48) is GRANTED in part such that Plaintiff is awarded a total of $34,664.80 in attorneys fees and $3,516.68 in costs in accordance with this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on January 16, 2015. (sas)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 37) for attorneys fees and costs is DENIED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiff may, within twenty-one(21) days of the filing date of this decision and order, submit a new, properly supported motion for attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 31, 2014. (sas)
March 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 16) for partial summary judgment on the Complaints (Dkt. No. 1) first, second, and fourth causes of action is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Cross-Motion (Dkt. No. 22) for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED, that the Complaints (Dkt. No. 1) third cause of action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant shall pay Plaintiffs attorneys f ees and costs in an amount to be determined by the Court at a later date. Plaintiff is ordered to file a motion concerning the amount of attorneys fees and costs for which it seeks reimbursement within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Defendant shall then have fourteen (14) days from the filing date of Plaintiffs motion to respond. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 27, 2013. (sas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berkshire Bank v. Tedeschi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Berkshire Bank
Represented By: Christopher M. Hennessey
Represented By: David E. Valicenti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy K. Tedeschi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?