Gaudette v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation et al
| Phillip A. Gaudette, Jr. |
| Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corporation and Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics |
| 1:2011cv00932 |
| August 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Albany |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; 59 Motion for Summary Judgment; and 65 Motion to Strike: The Court hereby ORDERS that NMHG's motion to preclude the testimony of Dennis Eckstine isDENIED; and the Court fu rther ORDERS that NMHG's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that FedEx's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the Court further ORDERS that Saint -Gobain's motion to strike is GRANTED and Saint-Gobain's motion for leave to file a sur-reply is DENIED as moot; and the Court further ORDERS that the parties' counsel shall be available for a telephone conference on April 9, 2014 at 1 1:30 a.m. to discuss setting a trial date; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 3/28/2014. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
