Levine v. Landy et al
| Barry Z. Levine |
| Elliott Landy and Landyvision, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv01038 |
| August 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Rensselaer |
| David N. Hurd |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER that counter-defendants Barry Z. Levine, Linanne G. Sackett, and The Brunswick Institute LLC's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; The Tortious Interference with Contract (Count V) and All Writs A ct (Count VII) counterclaims are DISMISSED; Counts I, II, III, IV, and VI remain and Barry Z. Levine, Linanne G. Sackett, and The Brunswick Institute LLC are directed to answer those counterclaims by June 1, 2012. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/18/2012. (see)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts Elliot Landy and Landyvision, Inc.'s 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Defts shall file an answer to the remaining causes of action on or before January 20 , 2012. The following causes of action remain and must be answered: (a) Counts 1-17, Copyright Infringement; (b) Count 18, Unjust Enrichment with respect to Group B photographs; (c) Count 19, Conversion; (d) Count 20, Lanham Act; and (e) Count 21, Accounting with respect to Group B photographs. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 12/30/2011. (see)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
