Rodriguez et al v. Village Green Realty, Inc. et al
Heidi Rodriguez and Juan Rodriguez |
Village Green Realty, Inc. and Blanca Aponte |
1:2011cv01068 |
September 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Albany Office |
Ulster |
David R. Homer |
Thomas J. McAvoy |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 DECISION & ORDER that pltfs motion for reconsideration is GRANTED and upon reconsideration defts motion to dismiss the claims under 3604(c) and (d) is GRANTED and pltfs motion for summary judgment on those same claims is DENIED. Defts cross-motion for reconsideration is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 11/15/2013. (see) |
Filing 76 DECISION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted insofar as all claims are dismissed with the exception of the retaliation claim. Plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment is granted insofar as the Court finds that VGR is vicariously liable for Aponte's actions and is denied in all other respects. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 10/10/2013. (dpk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.