Vaughan Company v. Global Bio-Fuels Technology, LLC et al
| Vaughan Company |
| Global Bio-Fuels Technology, LLC and Richard Behnke |
| 1:2012cv01292 |
| August 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Rensselaer |
| David N. Hurd |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
JUDGMENT: It is Ordered and Adjudged that Plaintiff's motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss Counts 1 through 4 of the Complaint without prejudice (ECF No. 120) is DENIED; Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 129) is G RANTED in part and DENIED in part; Defendants are GRANTED judgment as a matter of law concerning Counts 1 through 4 of the Complaint and such Counts are DISMISSED with Prejudice; Defendants are GRANTED judgment as a matter of law concerning its Secon d Counterclaim seeking a declaration of noninfringement; Defendants' request for sanctions and for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction is DENIED. All other relief requested pursuant to defendants' March 24, 2015 partial motion for summary judgment is DENIED; The remaining counts contained in plaintiff's complaint (Counts 5 through 9) and defendants' counterclaims (Counterclaims 1, 3,4, and 5) are DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to the 186 Memorandum-Decision and Order. (hmr, )
|
|
Filing
186
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER: that Plaintiff's motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss Counts 1 through 4 of the Complaint without prejudice (ECF No. 120 ) is Denied; Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 129 ) is Gran ted in part and Denied in part; Defendants are Granted judgment as a matter of law concerning Counts 1 through 4 of the Complaint and such Counts are Dismissed with Prejudice; Defendants are Granted judgment as a matter of law concerning its Second C ounterclaim seeking a declaration of noninfringement; Defendants' request for sanctions and for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction is Denied. All other relief requested pursuant to defendants' March 24, 2015 partial motion for sum mary judgment is Denied; The remaining counts contained in plaintiff's complaint (Counts 5 through 9) and defendants' counterclaims (Counterclaims 1, 3,4, and 5) are Dismissed without prejudice; The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon defendants in accordance with the Local Rules and The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 09/22/2016. (hmr)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER that GBFT's requests for Vaughan to immediately supplement its patent imfringement claim contentions and amend its responses to interrogatories and, to the extent that GBFT seeks permission to file a motion for Rule 11 sanctions are denied. Vaughan's initial claim contention chart shall stand and that GBFT shall serve its limited disclosure of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability contentions consistent with this Order. Parties shall file a proposed revised Scheduling Order by 7/18/14. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 7/11/14. (sfp, )
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Dismiss; denying Defendants' 39 Cross-Motion for judgment on the pleadings; and granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 51 Mot ion for leave to file a second amended answer and counterclaims. Counterclaims 1,4,5,6,9,10 and 12 are DISMISSED. Defenses 4,8,10, and 11 are STRICKEN. Defendants shall file the second amended answer and counterclaims on or before 10/30/2013. Upon the filing of the second amended answer and counterclaims, the caption shall be amended and a summons issued for service upon the additional counterclaim-defendants. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/23/2013. (amt)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER that defts' 17 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; and defts shall file their answer to the complaint on or before November 29, 2012. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 11/15/2012. (see)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
