LaBarre et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Frank G. LaBarre |
| Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Festus Kimotho Ndungu |
| 1:2012cv01316 |
| August 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Albany Office |
| Schoharie |
| Mae A. D'Agostino |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER re 76 Motion in Limine and 80 Motion in Limine: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding expert testimony not timely disclosed (Dkt. No. 76-9) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in par t; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding the inadequate lighting, slow speed, and mechanical defect of Defendants' vehicle (Dkt. No. 76-9) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' m otion in limine regarding evidence of violations of Defendant Werner's driver handbook (Dkt. No. 76-9) is RESERVED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding the photographs of Plaintiff's decedent post -mortem (Dkt. No. 76-9) is DENIED without prejudice; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding Defendant Ndungu's traffic citations (Dkt. No. 76-9) is GRANTED in part and RESERVED in part; and the Court fur ther ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding the loss of fringe benefits (Dkt. No. 76-9) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding non-pecuniary loss of the Plaintiff's decedent&# 039;s distributees (Dkt. No. 76-9) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine regarding the non-pecuniary loss of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 76-9) is RESERVED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motio n in limine regarding Investigator McLaughlin's conclusions and finding contained in the police report (Dkt. No. 80) is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine regarding evidence of eating cereal, putting on makeup, drinking tea, or taking medication while Plaintiff's decedent was driving (Dkt. No. 80) is RESERVED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine regarding a prior motor vehicle accident involving Plaintiff& #039;s decedent (Dkt. No. 80) is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine regarding video animation of the accident (Dkt. No. 80) is RESERVED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum- Decision and Order in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/4/15. (ban)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 52 Motion for Summary Judgment: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendants' motion to preclude Plaintiff's ex perts is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 8/5/15. (ban)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
